Jump to content
TheScientist101

Do lawyers ever have really "grand" offices?

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is a totally random question, but I've been wondering it for a while and thought I would just ask the ls.ca hive. 

I noticed that Hollywood always portrays lawyers' offices (especially partner offices) as being very large and grand - normally consisting of a personal washroom, a couch, a meeting table a large desk etc. However, in my experience, lawyers offices are not often that large - or grand. They usually consist of a desk, some chairs and book shelves. Sometimes partner offices are marginally larger, and they may include one additional small table for in-office meetings but it's not noticeably better than other lawyers' offices. 

Do the offices portrayed in Hollywood lawyer movies/tv shows actually exist in real life?

I mean, if they do exist I could understand a justification for such an office is the lawyer is facilitating client meetings in their personal office. However, I don't think that lawyers ever actually meet clients in their personal office - normally we do that sort of thing in a firm board room. So, why would a firm even justify spending the money on something like really fancy partner offices? 

Like I said - it's a random question that has absolutely no bearing on anything really pertinent - and I'm assuming (like almost all things from Hollywood) these kinds of partner offices really don't exist, but I'm interested to know none-the-less. 

Edited by TheScientist101
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Criminal defence lawyers that charge very high fees sometimes have very spacious offices that they actually meet clients in. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you'd see this sort of thing at a smaller firm. If you have a lucrative practice and are setting up your own space, why not ball out?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I was surprised by how not grand the partner offices in New York biglaw firms are.  Very, very ordinary. 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, NYCLawyer said:

I was surprised by how not grand the partner offices in New York biglaw firms are.  Very, very ordinary. 

Jails aren't known for being very grand.

 

;)

  • Like 5
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A couple of the partners at my firm have very nice offices, but they brought in their own furniture. Otherwise, most partners, even senior ones, have the same desk chair combo as me, just larger and with more "stuff". 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, pzabbythesecond said:

Jails aren't known for being very grand.

 

;)

Fair point. But if Goodfellas taught me anything it’s that there are well heeled prisoners with better setups that well heeled biglawyers. 

  • Like 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I once interviewed with a lawyer that had a very spacious office (large desk, chairs to sit in around the desk, sofas, a coffee table, and lots of space to spare). His office was effectively the entire floor of a 3 story townhouse with other lawyers occupying the other two floors. I know he has an assistant and other support staff but don't know where they work from as I didn't see any workstations for them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Agreed.  At best some older lawyers have some cool art. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, msk2012 said:

I once interviewed with a lawyer that had a very spacious office (large desk, chairs to sit in around the desk, sofas, a coffee table, and lots of space to spare). His office was effectively the entire floor of a 3 story townhouse with other lawyers occupying the other two floors. I know he has an assistant and other support staff but don't know where they work from as I didn't see any workstations for them.

A lawyer I know has an office that looks like an architecture firm. Tons of light, standing desk, full-wall whiteboard, design table for client meetings. He owns the building he's set up in so he just did what he wanted. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, there are lawyer offices that are very spacious and grand, and yes, some lawyers meet clients in them. But clients aren’t the only people that you might want to invite into your office. There are also other lawyers, media, accountants or other professionals, etc. Also some lawyers/partners figure that they spend so much time in their offices, they may as well make them enjoyable places to spend time. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pzabbythesecond said:

I feel like Providence providing that justification means she has a very grand office ;)

No, not at all, but I aspire to some day! 

I do have a window with a great view and I am good with that. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

While going through the interview process on Bay I was invited into partner offices at a number of firms.. for the most part they were a little larger than the standard small associate office, had additional seating, sometimes cool art or impressice plants (in one firm large potted trees seemed to be popular lol). But certainly nothing like what is seen on Suits. I suppose the reception area of a handful of firms was Suits-esque but that would be the extent of it 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I also interviewed at a handful of criminal law chambers(?) and found those offices to be much more impressive than those of the corporate lawyers 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been at some small offices that are really nice. But I didn't see the individual lawyers' offices. They had great reception areas and we met in really nice boardrooms. There are client confidentiality issues in having outsiders into your actual office.

I did get into the personal office of a lawyer who has a firm in a really nice townhouse in Yorkville. The common areas were spectacularly designed, but his own office was ... a normal sized office with a desk computer and meeting table.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Jaggers said:

 There are client confidentiality issues in having outsiders into your actual office.

Out of curiosity, what are the issues? It seems to be the norm for other professionals to meet clients in their own offices.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You can't let people see client confidential information, so if you're going to be having people in your offices, you have to keep your desk clear of any of it. Much easier to meet in a boardroom and bring the one necessary file along.

Paperless offices will change that calculation, but most offices aren't there yet.

  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

No. We have equal natural light access rights for everybody so in many cases, if your office was renovated within the last 15 years or so, you may not even have a window.

Edited by Jaggers
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Exactly. I keep having to remind myself that the index score is moderately reliable at best, and highly speculative at worst.  Does u of a wait till they receive fall grades before extending an offer? Because if that’s the case then I don’t think I’ll receive one (if I do) until January at the earliest.  Stqust, As for your GPA, that’s awesome! I think you’ll be alright based on the applicant profile 
    • I sympathize with you, this situation sucks and is becoming increasingly common as we have more graduates from more schools. If I were in your position I would look at the current year as being paid in experience but looking for something else for next year. I mean, you are probably better off than if you had to do the LPP. On the other hand, I wouldn't personally want to stay with a firm that under-paid me during articling just because they could.  It sounds like you really shot yourself in the foot by being over-eager to find any job and they are taking advantage of you a bit. Why didn't you discuss salary before a firm commitment? But I would want to know a lot more before giving any substantial advice, like what were your credentials like? Were you a top student with good extra-curricular's? What are your finances like? 
    • I went to Osgoode and worked in the admissions department, so I'll give you my thoughts. Based on numbers alone, you have no chance. The people who get into Osgoode with numbers in your range are anomalies and should not be taken as examples (probably less than 10 students out of a class of 290, and most of them were mature students with significant work experience). I say throw in an application to Osgoode but do not hedge your bets on it. Invest your time and energy at other schools like Windsor, that do have a truly holistic process and care more about your personal circumstances and extracurriculars. Osgoode receives 2500+ applications for 290 spots, and there will be people applying with better stats than yours who have similar experiences. I scanned your experiences and it's rather common among the Osgoode student body; this is not to take away from it but to say that it may not be as unique as you think. There were students in my class who came from poverty, who are immigrants, who are racialized minorities, who are LGBTQ, who had family and personal tragedies, who can speak multiple languages (very diverse class), who had significant work and volunteer experiences, etc. Osgoode is one of the most diverse law schools in Canada (along with Windsor and Ottawa). I would also be careful about trying to get an acceptance through a "pity parade" of sorts. Ultimately, Osgoode does want to accept a class of very accomplished individuals, who would benefit the legal profession and bring respect and recognition to the school. Don't be misled by students getting in with lower stats - most of them were mature applicants with 5+ years of work experience under their belt. The average cGPA was a 3.67 and average LSAT score a 162 for the last couple of rounds. To put it into perspective, I had a 160+ LSAT score and 3.7+ GPA and fell into at least four of the "categories" you had listed under your experiences. Good luck and I think you have a shot at other law schools, but not really Osgoode unless you get extremely lucky.  Edit: Reference letters don't make or break an application (unless it's extremely negative). Profreader mentioned this in another thread, but you can't know how strong a reference letter is if you have not read them. Now if you have read them, then it's also subjective based on the person reading the letter. Most law school applicants have good/strong letters in general. 
×