Jump to content
Sio

Will I ever go to law school ? (2.12)

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 4/22/2018 at 9:29 AM, Sio said:

Hi everyone, I have a bit of a situation and I’m hoping you guys can help me out. I apologize in advance for the long story!

I applied to law school for September admissions and so far have been rejected from everywhere except Ottawa but I’m not holding my breath at all for that. I want to apply for the next cycle but I want to do that with confidence.

Due to medical reasons the first two years of my undergrad were real crappy and my overall GPA is extremely low 2.12. I know. It’s awful. I got an LSAT of 152 but am planning to rewrite in September and I want to shoot for the 170s to sort of compensate for my shitty GPA. I was practice testing in the 160s when I was studying and test day was just a bunch of nerves and I ended up with 152 but anyways I know I can achieve a way higher LSAT if I put a lot of work and effort in. 

 

Even if I manage to achieve a high LSAT score my GPA is way too low and my question is, what can I do to raise my GPA? I’ve looked into pursuing a masters but of course don’t meet the admission requirements. I also looked into going back to university to complete an extra year but all the deadlines have long passed and I would have to apply in 2019 and that will push my law school applications for entry in 2020. 

I would really like to spend this year doing things to improve my application and increase my competitiveness. I’ve asked some of the law school admissions on what I can do to improve my app and they said I had great volunteering/LORs and PS but the stats don’t prove my ability to handle law school. So they said if I could take some extra courses and raise my GPA I could have a shot for next year. 

So, do you guys have any advice for me? Is there anything I can do degree-wise that would raise my GPA or overall just improve my application? Or do you think that I can’t overcome my GPA and I should just consider another path all together? 

Any help you guys can provide would be much appreciated! Thank you! 

and please, no negative comments! 

I had a 2.84 gpa, I returned to university and took a full course load + an extra 0.5 credit. When I applied with a 2.84 I got rejected from every school I applied to. But now after maintaining a 3.9 for this year. I got into Calgary Law and have yet to receive any rejections because they are waiting for my current second semester grades. So just because you take an extra year and start in 2018 September, you can still apply and wait and see if you will get in after your grades are submitted by professors in May. There may be a smaller chance of acceptance because of rolling admissions but that doesn't mean that you have to waste a year. I didn't get in and decided to go back to university for a year. Not ideal. But you have to do what it takes, because there are people on these forums who did not mess up their first years of schools and that's the nature of life. it is competitive. I would say your only option is to go back and improve on your GPA if that option is available to you. 

Edited by aaronl
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On April 23, 2018 at 12:39 PM, aaronl said:

I had a 2.84 gpa, I returned to university and took a full course load + an extra 0.5 credit. When I applied with a 2.84 I got rejected from every school I applied to. But now after maintaining a 3.9 for this year. I got into Calgary Law and have yet to receive any rejections because they are waiting for my current second semester grades. So just because you take an extra year and start in 2018 September, you can still apply and wait and see if you will get in after your grades are submitted by professors in May. There may be a smaller chance of acceptance because of rolling admissions but that doesn't mean that you have to waste a year. I didn't get in and decided to go back to university for a year. Not ideal. But you have to do what it takes, because there are people on these forums who did not mess up their first years of schools and that's the nature of life. it is competitive. I would say your only option is to go back and improve on your GPA if that option is available to you. 

2.84 is 0.72 higher than 2.12. That is a huge difference in GPA.

There are too many if(s) that make it hard to make any prediction. 

I was hoping to get 180 when I wrote the third time and didn't get anything near that.

With a 2.12, I doubt even 170 would help. 

There are a few thousands law school applicants each year and many with a lot better stats than 2.12 and 152 or 170 get rejected. Unless there are something unique in your application.

Do you have a plan B? 

 

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 22/04/2018 at 10:29 AM, Sio said:

Hi everyone, I have a bit of a situation and I’m hoping you guys can help me out. I apologize in advance for the long story!

I applied to law school for September admissions and so far have been rejected from everywhere except Ottawa but I’m not holding my breath at all for that. I want to apply for the next cycle but I want to do that with confidence.

Due to medical reasons the first two years of my undergrad were real crappy and my overall GPA is extremely low 2.12. I know. It’s awful. I got an LSAT of 152 but am planning to rewrite in September and I want to shoot for the 170s to sort of compensate for my shitty GPA. I was practice testing in the 160s when I was studying and test day was just a bunch of nerves and I ended up with 152 but anyways I know I can achieve a way higher LSAT if I put a lot of work and effort in. 

 

Even if I manage to achieve a high LSAT score my GPA is way too low and my question is, what can I do to raise my GPA? I’ve looked into pursuing a masters but of course don’t meet the admission requirements. I also looked into going back to university to complete an extra year but all the deadlines have long passed and I would have to apply in 2019 and that will push my law school applications for entry in 2020. 

I would really like to spend this year doing things to improve my application and increase my competitiveness. I’ve asked some of the law school admissions on what I can do to improve my app and they said I had great volunteering/LORs and PS but the stats don’t prove my ability to handle law school. So they said if I could take some extra courses and raise my GPA I could have a shot for next year. 

So, do you guys have any advice for me? Is there anything I can do degree-wise that would raise my GPA or overall just improve my application? Or do you think that I can’t overcome my GPA and I should just consider another path all together? 

Any help you guys can provide would be much appreciated! Thank you! 

and please, no negative comments! 

What is your L2/B2? If you improve your LSAT by 8 point or more, and have a decent L2/B2 (3.5+), it's possible to get admissions at a school that accepts L2/B2.

However, this is a long shot in my personal opinion. I don't know how much more time and money you want to invest in trying to achieve a long shot. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
36 minutes ago, conge said:

What is your L2/B2? If you improve your LSAT by 8 point or more, and have a decent L2/B2 (3.5+), it's possible to get admissions at a school that accepts L2/B2.

However, this is a long shot in my personal opinion. I don't know how much more time and money you want to invest in trying to achieve a long shot. 

My math is not really good

2.12 GPA x 4 years             = 8.48

with 3.5 L2 =               3.5 x 2 =7.00

that means year 1&% 2          =1.48/2 = .74

That will be a lot of Ds and Fs for year 1 and 2

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On ‎28‎/‎04‎/‎2018 at 10:54 AM, Luckycharm said:

My math is not really good

2.12 GPA x 4 years             = 8.48

with 3.5 L2 =               3.5 x 2 =7.00

that means year 1&% 2          =1.48/2 = .74

That will be a lot of Ds and Fs for year 1 and 2

 

So L2/B2 is a 3.5 average? That's a big jump from first 2 years being a 1.48 average. I think that will be looked upon favourably by admissions. If I were you, I'd concentrate on improving your LSAT. Set a study schedule and do lots of practice exams, like a couple a week or more. If you can achieve a 160+ score, you could get in somewhere.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, conge said:

So L2/B2 is a 3.5 average? That's a big jump from first 2 years being a 1.48 average. I think that will be looked upon favourably by admissions. If I were you, I'd concentrate on improving your LSAT. Set a study schedule and do lots of practice exams, like a couple a week or more. If you can achieve a 160+ score, you could get in somewhere.

 

first and second year will be 0.74. That will be academic suspension in many universities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Ambit aren't you a 0L? Let's not speak with such confidence when you have literally zero exposure to the recruiting procedure from either side of the fence.
    • Hey OP, I would highly recommend just fool proofing the LG section using the 7Sage method. It is literally the best, IMO. Also, contrary to what has already been said, I highly recommend not doing LG sections from tests 1-30. They are very, very different from what you will encounter on test day! Believe me when I say that! After having mastered the games from 52 - 80s, I went back to try the LG sections from PTs 1-30 and they were very hard and very different and absolutely nothing like many of the recent games. Sometimes, those games also have like 2-3 misc. games (which you can't foolproof since they are always different). I would recommend just using PTs 52 - to the latest ones (80 something now) and fool proof those. By the end, you will be very prepared to handle virtually all games come your way test day. Hope that helps     ALSO: I think after fool proofing approximately 10 LG sections, you will start to approach the LG section almost unconsciously and on automatic, which is nice  
    • Graduation awards, as far as I know, have gone out. The rest I am not sure. Nevermind, I thought you meant graduation bursaries. So I actually don't know the answer to your question at all, haha
    • She provides that a decision having an unjustified and disproportionate impact (“that seriously infringes”, in your words) on a Charter right will always be unreasonable, but she doesn’t then say the LSBC’s decision was unjustified and disproportionate (or seriously infringed). She instead meets the majority and dissent halfway by reasoning that while the decision’s negative impact “could not be characterized as minor”, its benefits were nonetheless proportionate, rendering the decision reasonable. "With respect" followed by brow beating. They straight up called out McLachlin and Karakatsanis by saying they were hypocrites, citing extra-judicial commentary. Unbecoming to say the least.   The denial of TWU’s proposed law school with the mandatory covenant is itself good: (i) The covenant likely runs afoul of provincial human rights legislation; (ii) the covenant itself is unnecessary and ridiculous, (not convinced by the concurring or dissenting reasons to the contrary); and (iii) a ruling that TWU Law with the Covenant could go ahead would, however reasoned, reflect poorly on the legal profession because much of the general public wouldn’t appreciate the rationale behind such a decision. But the reasoning of this case, as you allude to, leaves much to be desired. I agree with Cote and Brown when they say the majority’s analysis of the LPA is wrong. They hit the nail on the head when they said that the scope of the LSBC’s statutory authority defines how it carries out its public interest mandate, and not the other way around. The LPA’s provisions and mandate relate to matters relevant to the governance of the legal profession and its constituent parts, and, in that way, they empower the LSBC to “control the doorway to the profession, not to decide who knocks on the door.” Equal access to the legal profession and diversity in the legal profession are, indeed, distinct from the duty to ensure competent practice and the majority decision does leave you wondering if things like tuition fees are also fair game (though I think bursaries, scholarships, loans, etc. weaken the dissent’s analogy). Beyond that and maybe their comments on the problems with weighing Charter rights and Charter values, the dissent goes off course and I prefer the concurring reasons. Brown and Cote’s diversity argument is borderline disingenuous. It stems from a conflation of “religious law schools” and “religious law schools with unnecessarily discriminatory covenants”. smh when they used the idea of religion being about “religious relationships” and when they said qualities that go to a person’s self-identity are at stake for TWU community members. On that note, I’m surprised McLachlin went as far as to say the LSBC’s decision deprives TWU community members of the ability to express their beliefs in institutional form and from associating in the manner they believe their faith requires. That is quite a stretch. I also think the dissent are off on the “reasonableness” piece when they say the Benchers abdicated their duty. I see no issue in conducting the reasonableness analysis when an elected administrative body carefully considers a proposition (or “deliberates”), determines it’s leaning one way on that proposition but thinks either of two solutions is reasonable, then puts that proposition to a referendum (though the Benchers likely knew what the outcome of the referendum would be, and also didn’t want to deal with the fallout of approving TWU Law with the covenant).
    • I would mention it for sure, my partner moved to Canada from Iran around 5 years ago as well and deinfltey the religious police.will be picky about stuff like that  Like.providence mentioned relate it back to law and keep it effiencnt there isn't that much space so show how that motivated you to be practice  law, she mentioned a few great ways of.how to do that, be honest and make.it personal because it will show and reflect positively In terms of gpa you have a OK cgpa ( just make.sure this the olsas cgpa) and  a very good  l2 and b3, for osgoode your cgpa and lower end lsat will not make you a strong applicant per say ( I think 2016 median cgpa was 3.67 and median lsat 162)and for u of t your b3 is competitive BUT your lsat will be a serious problem here because their median is 166, BUT for both schools they have "holistic" approaches so sometimes candidate get in who don't necceqaily meet the medians but they have other aspects or qualities that would be an asset to the incoming class and also prove their aptitude for law and plus your kinda close to the medians for osgoode so I woudlny be shocked u of t i think your lsat is hurting you a lot though and you would need that up significantly to go there  Ottawa is also a cgpa school but your lsat will be good I think, but your cgpa is not bad at all so maybe? I honestly don't know much about them I've never seen class stats for them I think western and queens would be solid schools to apply to as well, your l2 is above their last posted class median yoir cgpa is right at their class median, plus your lsat is closer to their class median of 161 albeit still a bit below  I would also apply to Windsor as well  they like personal statements tailored to social justice btw  If your lsat hit 166 or higher I think you have a strong shot at u of t, 164 or higher a strong shot at Osgoode ), western and queens 161 or higher  strong shot too especially since your b2/l2 beats the median for both and your cgpa beats the median for last year's class for cgpa for queens, but that guarantees nothing this whole admission process is a little random somtieme, deinfltey apply and I'm pretty confident you get in somewhere, stenghrn your LOT and personal statement and ec list as much as possible, and if you can try to get higher on the lsat I would.personally do so   Good luck!    
×