Jump to content
harveyspecter993

Does Western put more emphasis on CGPA or L2?

Recommended Posts

Based on what I've heard/read, your initial ranking is based on your CGPA, then they consider your L2 and softs when they get to your application (I could be getting this mixed up with Queens). As far as the weighting from there, I think it's hard to give a definitive answer on whether it's 50:50 or 60:40 etc. What I do know is that it helps to have a strong L2 (and LSAT as well as softs), if you have a weak CGPA.

 

Disclaimer: I'm only an applicant, so I'm still in the middle of figuring this out myself.

Edited by dparkus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Based on what I've heard/read, your initial ranking is based on your CGPA, then they consider your L2 and softs when they get to your application (I could be getting this mixed up with Queens). As far as the weighting from there, I think it's hard to give a definitive answer on whether it's 50:50 or 60:40 etc. What I do know is that it helps to have a strong L2 (and LSAT as well as softs), if you have a weak CGPA.

 

Disclaimer: I'm only an applicant, so I'm still in the middle of figuring this out myself.

 

They actually say they place more emphasis on your L2

 

http://law.uwo.ca/future_students/jd_admissions/admissions_FAQ/grades_and_courses.html

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

probably more of a L2 emphasis, my cgpa was 3.07, L2 like 3.7 and im at western now

Omygod, you give me hope...that's so close to my stats

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

My L2 blows my CGPA out of the water, so I hope there's more of an emphasis on the former haha.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you mind sharing your LSAT score?

 

wrote it 3 times, best was a 169, but I am certain I was accepted on my score of 162 (I was accepted to Western before I got the results that I scored a 169)

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Recent Posts

    • Thanks for the input. Yeah, the climate isn't the biggest factor for me. I want to live and work in either Calgary or Vancouver because I have family in both cities. Not Edmonton. I understand that if I want to practice in BC (UBC/UVIC aren't an option for me) U of A is the better choice. So is it worth going to Edmonton and networking out there even though I have no intention of staying there? Or should I go to Calgary where there is a fairly good chance I might stay there.    I'm probably going to end up attending U of A because the tuition and cost of living are cheaper and I'm paying for school myself.
    • @Psychometronic I agree with you it wasn' ideal, there are better ways to handle it, I would have personally loved 4 months and taken my time in a different manner but that's just me, in reality the situation unfolded differently  My reason for mentioning that was more to illustrate to OP that although I averaged 168 over a large sample size( over 30 practice tests, albeit i showed high variance e.g. scoring 172 on a test and next day scoring a 160) and my max tail end of my lsat score distribution was in the high 170 range, my actual real day test scores ended up being all the way at the other end of the distribution tail end ( the 160 and 162 range, literally my lowest scores in my entire distribution), and this was not due to nerves I usually looked forward to the moment to be honest, there are reason I can speculate to why this happened but not relevant to my point for OP. Point was mostly that I know it sucks but sometimes our lsat scores in our practice tests can Defintley predict our possible range for test day, but to predict the exact score could be more difficult e.g. it could end up on the high end of your distribution or the low end, planning for the absolute high end is probably not a good idea in making life plans      Age should not necessarily be a deterrent, I myself will be 28 when I enter law school this September , but for my situation it makes sense to me , for others it may not , we each must individually evaluate our own circumstances I have known people to go to medical school in a md/PhD program finishing  at 40 and eventually  become faculty head in that md/PhD program  , I know multiple people who started their PhD at 26 ( PhD in biologal sciences can easily take 5 to 6 years sometimes depeding on school and field etc) so they finished mid 30s after postdocs etc and they ended up in tenure track professors jobs at very respected institutions, great life great salary they love their job etc etc etc  Don' let age alone stop you, but look carefully at your situation and where you wanna be at a given age and how you want your circumstances to be ( some people might want to already be earning a living for their family at 31, not applying to law schools ),     
    • *Whoops, I should've probably mentioned that I did in fact receive an offer with the above stats and that's why I wouldn't worry if I were you lol. Good luck!
    • Why not? Do you not figure that the students are any different in between NYU and Cardozo? 
×