Rejected 2012
#1
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:09 AM
Stats:
GPA: 2.9 (Olsas)
MA: 3.7
LSAT: 163
#2
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:15 AM
If you don't mind, by what means did you find out? (infoweb, email, snail mail, etc.)
#3
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:17 AM
#4
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:18 AM
Oh wait,.. forgot my password at home
Sorry to hear the news!
#5
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:20 AM
#6
Posted 14 February 2012 - 10:48 AM
#7
Posted 14 February 2012 - 11:52 AM
#8
Posted 14 February 2012 - 11:59 AM
CGPA: 3.5
LSAT: 169
#10
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:03 PM
#12
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:10 PM
lawlady11, on 14 February 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:
CGPA: 3.5
LSAT: 169
To the OP, congratulations on your acceptance to Manitoba and good luck with the rest of the cycle.
#14
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:36 PM
#15
Posted 14 February 2012 - 12:49 PM
#16
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:01 PM
169, 3.50 = Rejected but 163, 3.36 = Accepted. And me lying inbetween on both gpa and lsat
Dyin here.
#17
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:45 PM
lawlady11, on 14 February 2012 - 12:36 PM, said:
FWIW I have a buddy who got into Queen's with a $10,000 merit scholarship last cycle. His stats were exactly 3.5/169. Best of luck!
#18
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:49 PM
#19
Posted 14 February 2012 - 01:53 PM
#20
Posted 14 February 2012 - 02:06 PM
#21
Posted 14 February 2012 - 03:50 PM
lawlady11, on 14 February 2012 - 11:59 AM, said:
CGPA: 3.5
LSAT: 169
cGPA 3.5 and LSAT 169 is very good stats. what is your best 2 and last 2.
Is that undergrad cGPA or Master?
I can't believe Ottawa will reject you let lone this early in the cycle.
I can only imagine that you may have a typo such as University of OOttaawwaa
Can not figure out any other reason
what are EC and LOR like ?
Edited by Rathergofishing, 14 February 2012 - 03:51 PM.
#22
Posted 14 February 2012 - 04:33 PM
I am equally surprised at the 3.5/169 rejection. Did you use any racist language in your PS (just kidding)?
Maybe an LOR back fired.
#23
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:08 PM
#24
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:28 PM
You're in elsewhere though yes?
#25
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:30 PM
#26
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:31 PM
Sorry to hear about it lawlady11
#27
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:54 PM
I know some students with stellar stats were denied acceptance because they took a "full-time course" load which was not necessarily a full course load while in their undergrad.
#28
Posted 14 February 2012 - 06:59 PM
meager, on 14 February 2012 - 06:54 PM, said:
I know some students with stellar stats were denied acceptance because they took a "full-time course" load which was not necessarily a full course load while in their undergrad.
#29
Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:19 PM
#30
Posted 14 February 2012 - 07:35 PM
Jax29, on 14 February 2012 - 06:59 PM, said:
Yes - my last semester I only had 9 credits left to take, so had 3 courses and it wasn't an issue for any school.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users








