For those who did well on the LSAT using the PowerScore Bibles as their starting point, did you folks go through them one-by-one (e.g., read the LG Bible from cover-to-cover follow by reading the LR Bible from cover-to-cover before finally reading the RC Bible from cover-to-cover) or all three at the same time (e.g., read Chapter 1 in each of the three bibles and then proceed to read Chapter 2 in each of the three bibles, etc.?) Which way do you find more effective?
Going Through The Powerscore Bibles One-By-One Or Simultaneously?
Started by Neo, Feb 04 2012 04:19 PM
3 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 04 February 2012 - 04:19 PM
#2
Posted 04 February 2012 - 06:58 PM
I went through the LG and then the LR bibles one at a time. I never actually read the RC bible. I suspect that if you read them all at the same time it could be a bit confusing. Each one gives you a lot of information (often an information overload) and it might be hard to keep things straight. Focus on one and learn it well before moving on to something else.
And keep an open mind about Powerscore and any source material you study from. Powerscore, for example, doesn't work for everyone. It certainly didn't work for me. Don't be hesitant to explore different methods and figure out what works for you.
And keep an open mind about Powerscore and any source material you study from. Powerscore, for example, doesn't work for everyone. It certainly didn't work for me. Don't be hesitant to explore different methods and figure out what works for you.
#3
Posted 07 March 2012 - 08:35 AM
I tried to mix it up a little because I'd get super bored sticking with one topic the whole time but I really think it depends on your personal preference. What I did worked for me and I ended up with good results. I personally would swear by the PS bibles but they are dense so make sure to leave lots of time to get through them all.
#4
Posted 07 March 2012 - 03:37 PM
I read them one by one using Steve Schwartz's study guide.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users








