Scaling back class size
#1
Posted 14 November 2011 - 08:22 PM
#2
Posted 15 November 2011 - 09:48 AM
#3
Posted 18 November 2011 - 06:54 AM
#4
Posted 19 December 2011 - 12:07 AM
#5
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:11 AM
#6
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:05 AM
#7
Posted 19 December 2011 - 07:20 AM
erinl2, on 19 December 2011 - 07:05 AM, said:
I believe English Common Law lets in about 280.
Add to that 50-80 from the French Common Law section.
Add to that 30-50 doing the national program (Civil and Common Law in 1)
Add to that the approx 5 that come from MSU.
And we have a crazy amount of students.
Do I wish that I went someplace else?
Yes.
#8
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:11 AM
#9
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:15 AM
#10
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:20 AM
UpAboveIt715, on 19 December 2011 - 07:20 AM, said:
Add to that 50-80 from the French Common Law section.
Add to that 30-50 doing the national program (Civil and Common Law in 1)
Add to that the approx 5 that come from MSU.
And we have a crazy amount of students.
Do I wish that I went someplace else?
Yes.
Don't forget the 200 or so Civil kids each year as well. Although we don't compete with them, they take up a hella lot of room in the building and they're annoying as well
#11
Posted 19 December 2011 - 08:21 AM
schroed, on 19 December 2011 - 08:11 AM, said:
#12
Posted 19 December 2011 - 12:10 PM
#15
Posted 19 December 2011 - 12:50 PM
Edit: One other thing to add - far less people from Ottawa apply to Toronto for articling than they do during Toronto OCIs. This is because the Ottawa articulating recruitment schedule is before Toronto, and with OCI's, Toronto is before Ottawa. Thus, you automatically take away a good chunk of applicants during articling recruitment.
Edited by lawlady1985, 19 December 2011 - 12:56 PM.
#16
Posted 19 December 2011 - 12:57 PM
pk_00, on 19 December 2011 - 12:10 PM, said:
I'm not sure where you came up with those numbers, given what's been posted above.
In any case, the number isn't much different than the size of Osgoode. Class size, in and of itself, isn't necessarily a negative. If it was, then I suppose that none of you would have any interest in attending many of the top U.S. law schools.
#17
Posted 19 December 2011 - 03:31 PM
erinl2, on 19 December 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:
In any case, the number isn't much different than the size of Osgoode. Class size, in and of itself, isn't necessarily a negative. If it was, then I suppose that none of you would have any interest in attending many of the top U.S. law schools.
snap
anyway, unless the circumstances are really different from undergrad to law-school, I've never felt any problems going to a big school (went [I can used past tense now!] to UO) in terms of knowing people/profs/personal attention. Hell, I've talked obscure math-rock bands from Montreal, gone drinking, and seen my profs at concerts during my undergrad. Though the articling thing could be a problem though I guess, but hey its Ottawa, government jobs!
Edited by jmcazabon, 19 December 2011 - 03:36 PM.
#18
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:08 PM
erinl2, on 19 December 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:
#19
Posted 19 December 2011 - 05:19 PM
erinl2, on 19 December 2011 - 12:57 PM, said:
In any case, the number isn't much different than the size of Osgoode. Class size, in and of itself, isn't necessarily a negative. If it was, then I suppose that none of you would have any interest in attending many of the top U.S. law schools.
haha, sorry, i added the civil law numbers in too. should have been 410 common law + 200 civil law.
#20
Posted 20 December 2011 - 08:05 PM
WannaBeLaw99, on 19 December 2011 - 12:19 PM, said:
#21
Posted 21 December 2011 - 08:45 AM
a ) it affords more freedom, e.g. skipping, talking, etc
b ) it reduces the number of sycophants always asking questions and being all around awful human beings
c ) less emphasis on presentations/group work and more on written tests
Edited by Lawl, 21 December 2011 - 08:45 AM.
#23
Posted 22 December 2011 - 10:58 PM
Lawl, on 21 December 2011 - 08:45 AM, said:
a ) it affords more freedom, e.g. skipping, talking, etc
b ) it reduces the number of sycophants always asking questions and being all around awful human beings
c ) less emphasis on presentations/group work and more on written tests
you have said so much that I feel right there,
We may be soul-mates.
#24
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:16 PM
#25
Posted 29 January 2012 - 12:15 PM
All my Ottawa U friends complain about all the above. All are funding issues that could be relieved with smaller class sizes.
#26
Posted 29 January 2012 - 01:15 PM
#27
Posted 29 January 2012 - 01:20 PM
#28
Posted 29 January 2012 - 06:08 PM
theiva4, on 29 January 2012 - 01:20 PM, said:
Just a quick point about articling rates: The number of articling spots has nothing to do with U of Ottawa. That is a problem around the province. Ottawa's numbers are fairly comparable to other schools in the province if you look at it relative to the number of students I do believe.
Also articling rates will depend on a number of factors such as
1) the number of students who choose not to pursue articling (as a 3L I can tell you this is more common than you would think)
2) the number of students who pursue a career in another jurisdiction (these may or may not be included in the rate you have seen...depends where you got it from)
3) the number of students who pursue post-law degree studies such as an LL.M or MA
4) the area of law in which the students at that school are pursuing (for example, a school with lots of criminal law focused students will have a much lower rate of success in finding articles than a school where the majority of students are on the corporate/commercial path)
I can tell you that while there are still a number of us that I know of looking for articling positions for next year, it is very unlikely it is because of the school we attended. I'm just about done my degree at U of O and I don't think the size of my classes has affected my learning at all.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users








